<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital vs. Film</title>
	<link>http://www.psychicbunny.com/blog/2007/27/digital-vs-film/</link>
	<description>Psychic Bunny yaps about whatever.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.psychicbunny.com/blog/2007/27/digital-vs-film/#comment-14</link>
		<author>Doug</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.psychicbunny.com/blog/2007/27/digital-vs-film/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Can I get one with a variety of mechanical spider legs?  If so, debate = over!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get one with a variety of mechanical spider legs?  If so, debate = over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.psychicbunny.com/blog/2007/27/digital-vs-film/#comment-13</link>
		<author>Rick</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.psychicbunny.com/blog/2007/27/digital-vs-film/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I suspect in the not-so-distant future we'll all be arguing over whether to go out biological bodies, or those brand new mechbodies. And well, it all just depends on what you want to DO with that body. Obviously we're all going to wait for the ones that last 200 years, or else we'll just be paying twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect in the not-so-distant future we&#8217;ll all be arguing over whether to go out biological bodies, or those brand new mechbodies. And well, it all just depends on what you want to DO with that body. Obviously we&#8217;re all going to wait for the ones that last 200 years, or else we&#8217;ll just be paying twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.psychicbunny.com/blog/2007/27/digital-vs-film/#comment-11</link>
		<author>Craig</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.psychicbunny.com/blog/2007/27/digital-vs-film/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>This debate is very similar to the 3D vs cell animation debate.  It really depends on the work in question, budget and capabilities and other factors.  
It always bugs me when people say oh 3D is much better than cell animation or vise versa.  
It really devolves down to one major question - 'what kind of style and feel are you going for?', this really should be the deciding factor, not some knee-jerk reaction on either side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This debate is very similar to the 3D vs cell animation debate.  It really depends on the work in question, budget and capabilities and other factors.<br />
It always bugs me when people say oh 3D is much better than cell animation or vise versa.<br />
It really devolves down to one major question - &#8216;what kind of style and feel are you going for?&#8217;, this really should be the deciding factor, not some knee-jerk reaction on either side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
